Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:45

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Teen girl from 6,200 years ago with cone-shaped skull unearthed in Iran - Phys.org
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What to know about rare brain-eating amoeba after Texas woman dies - ABC News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Stopping alcoholism gets smarter with smartwatches - The Brighter Side of News
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
What has been your best sexual experience?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
iOS 26's New Battery Life Mode Available Only on These iPhone Models - MacRumors